Do you think municipal taxes should:
a) Reduce in absolute terms
b) Reduce in real terms (grow, but slower than inflation)
c) Reduce in relative terms (grow, but slower than inflation plus population growth)
d) Stay the same (grow, but only in line with inflation plus population growth)
e) Increase a bit (grow in line with the city’s Municipal Price Index)
f) Increase more (grow faster than the city’s Municipal Price Index)
Answer 1.1 [Choose One]:
[No Answer Provided]
I have seen suggestions for tying taxes to the rate of inflation, tying them to the rate of inflation plus population growth and in line with the City’s Municipal Price Index, I’m not sure which is the best choice. I would like to see greater predictability in taxes, the increases Calgarians have seen over the last few years, non-residential and residential have created hardships. We should be able to have some idea of what our tax increases may be.
Would you vote in favour of allocating any tax dollars or giving any subsidy towards a new stadium/arena?
Answer 2.1 [Yes/No Only]:
If yes, how much and in what form would these taxes take (direct cash, land, subsidy, indirect, etc), and why do you support public dollars being directed towards a corporation?
I would only support public dollars to the arena if there is an absolute return on investment, a guaranteed income back to the City.
Recent research on Calgary’s City Council found that council spends nearly a quarter of its’ time meeting in private (in camera). Do you agree that this is too much time spent in private?
Answer 3.1 [Yes/No Only]:
If so, what would you do to fix this? Which topics do you believe should be discussed behind closed doors and why?
I believe legal matters, procurement/negotiation related matters and HR matters are acceptable reasons to go in camera. Otherwise, a Councillor should be able to own their decisions and have public comment on the issues of the City.
I will vote no to in camera sessions not regarding sensitive information related to the items I mentioned above.
From the $470,000 Blue Ring, to the $236,000 for a “Poop Palace”, and now another $500,000 for Bowfort Towers, council has consistently failed to engage with Calgarians about which public Art projects their tax dollars are spent on. Do you support continuing to use taxpayer dollars to fund art projects for the city?
Answer 4.1 [Yes/No Only]:
If yes, why do you think council and administration have repeatedly failed on this issue, and what guidelines should be used to ensure Calgarians are happy with the results in future?
The current public art policy, which current Council approved, worked exactly as it was supposed to. The issues which stem from it center around the location of the art, the use of non-local artists and the choices being made in which piece of art is selected. The current public art policy needs to be amended. First, we can change the location of the piece so it is actually interactive and Calgarians can enjoy the carvings in the rocks made by the river. Second, we are bound by international agreements to put the tender out to international artists. As artists outside of Calgary benefit from these agreements, so do our local artists in other cities. Third, the current selection committee consists entirely of people with art related backgrounds, including someone with no background in the arts would provide a more objective voice in the selection process.
How can council support small businesses?
I have spoken with two recently opened small businesses in ward 4 and there is a lot we can do even before the doors open. One of the businesses I spoke with had to work with twelve different departments to get everything they needed. This process should not be so cumbersome as to discourage someone from opening their business. The other business had to delay their opening because of an inspection, being told by one inspector they needed specific drawings, while another inspector told the owner it was not necessary. Consistency in the requirements would be beneficial to businesses opening in a timely manner, not losing money because the City process lacks consistency.
Do you support the current plan for construction of the Green Line?
Answer 6.1 [Yes/No Only]:
The construction of the Green Line was approved based on a cost-benefit analysis that assumed the project would be completed two years earlier than now projected, and at a lower construction cost for the entire line than is now estimated for half of the line. If the costs increase again or the project is further delayed, would you continue to support it, and why?
I will continue to support it. In my mind this project is at best twenty years behind. It was necessary to begin when the communities of Harvest Hills and Coventry Hills were approved. Previous City Council’s have created their own monster. They continued to approve communities further from the core with no serious consideration as to how those Calgarians would be able to travel around the city. I do not wish to deny anyone their choice in where they live, but the decisions by the City have created the extreme need for this infrastructure.
At the end of the day, the Greenline is vital. We need to ensure it is completed in a way so the communities it will travel in do not lose their appeal and current City assets remain accessible.
In July, City Council voted against a motion to hold a referendum/plebiscite on whether Calgary should bid to host the 2026 Winter Olympics bid. Do you support holding a referendum / plebiscite on whether Calgary should bid to host the 2026 Winter Olympics bid?
Answer 7.1 [Yes/No Only]:
Why do you support/oppose a public vote? Should the results of a vote should be binding?
I oppose a public vote because I have spoken to enough Calgarians in ward 4 to know they do not want it, a plebiscite would be a waste of money. Councillors are elected to represent the views of their ward residents and simply asking them would save a lot of time and money.
Be the first to comment
Sign in with